Friday, August 11, 2006
Thursday, August 10, 2006
War Quotes
'Can anything be more ridiculous than that a man has a right to kill me because he lives on the other side of the water, and because his ruler has quarrel with mine, although I have none with him?'
'Force always attracts men of low morality.'
'What an immense mass of evil must result...from allowing men to assume the right of anticipating what may happen.'
'The greater the state, the more wrong and cruel its patriotism, and the greater is the sum of suffering upon which its power is founded.'
'We must not only cease our present desire for the growth of the state, but we must desire its decrease, its weakening...'
'In all history there is no war which was not hatched by the governments, the governments alone, independent of the interests of the people, to whom war is always pernicious even when successful.'
'The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.'
'The shepherd always tries to persuade the sheep that their interests and his own are the same.'
'Don't regard yourself as a guardian of freedom unless you respect and preserve the rights of people you disagree with...'
'War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious.'
'After every ''victory'' you have more enemies.'
'Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence.'
'The worst crimes were dared by a few, willed by more and tolerated by all.'
'I am not blaming those who are resolved to rule, only those who show an even greater readiness to submit.'
'It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.'
'Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it.'
'War is the unfolding of miscalculations.'
'Dulce bellum inexpertis (War is delightful to the inexperienced).'
'War is not a word, it's an acronym for "Wasting Another's Resources."'
'A man who says that no patriot should attack the war until it is over...is saying no good son should warn his mother of a cliff until she has fallen.'
'Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.'
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
War News Radio
War News Radio
"War News Radio is a production of Swarthmore College in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, USA. Our weekly, 29-minute program is currently carried on numerous radio stations worldwide and is available for free public broadcast."
From a Wired interview with Stephen Colbert.
Be an Expert on Anything
CHOOSE A SUBJECT THAT'S ACTUALLY SECRET. Dan Brown invented a secret subject for The Da Vinci Code, so now he is forever an expert on this secret subject that no one can challenge. Anybody who attacks the secret subject is, by definition, part of the cabal.
GET YOUR OWN ENTRY IN AN ENCYCLOPEDIA. In the media age, everybody was famous for 15 minutes. In the Wikipedia age, everybody can be an expert in five minutes. Special bonus: You can edit your own entry to make yourself seem even smarter.
USE THE WORD ZEITGEIST AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE. Ideally, you want to find words that sound familiar but people don’t really know their definitions: zeitgeist, bildungsroman, doppelgänger – better yet, anything Latin. But avoid paradigm. It’s so 1994. If you say the word paradigm, everybody knows you’re a poser.
BE SURE TO USE LOTS OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS. Someone who says the words operations security may be educated, but the person who uses the military abbreviation Opsec is clearly an expert. If I use the term Gitmo, that means I’ve actually been there. If you say, “We’re going to Defcon 1,” it means you probably have the launch codes. Real experts don’t have time for extra syllables.
SPEAK FROM THE BALLS, NOT FROM THE DIAPHRAGM. In the expert game, you’ve got to have sack. That means speaking with confidence. In America, you’ve got to steer clear of nuance and ambivalence – and don’t even contemplate doubt.
DON'T BE AFRAID TO MAKE THINGS UP. Never fear being exposed as a fraud. Experts make things up all the time. They’re qualified to.
DON'T LIMIT YOURSELF TO CURRENT KNOWLEDGE. If you worry too much about being up-to-date, you miss out on vast territories of obsolete knowledge just waiting to be reclaimed. Think of leech-craft and all the lonely experts in the use of the little creatures, which are now experiencing a renaissance in health care.
GET AN HONORARY PHD. They work wonders. I have a doctorate in fine arts from Knox College in Illinois. All I did was give a speech, and now everybody has to call me Dr. Colbert.
MAKE A HABIT OF NAME-DROPPING. Say things like “I was talking to John Hockenberry yesterday for my story in Wired. Have you seen my cover?” I plan to use this issue of Wired to assert that I now know everything about wires.
BE FAMOUS. IT HELPS.
City of God
'Because I do it with one small ship, I am called a terrorist. You do it with a whole fleet and are called an emperor.'
~A pirate, from St. Augustine's "City of God"
Friday, October 14, 2005
Zionist Christians
Having said that, the Zionist movement itself has been accused of racism towards Arabs. This charge has been made mostly by Muslem nations, in different colourful and dramatic ways. They try and get this message out, but the empathy has not been pouring in. Its hard for me not to agree with them; at the very least I think that one would have to admit a strong potential for this sort of racism in Zionism, if not its actual presence.
But then many people don't see this at all. God gave them (the Jewish people) that land, so the Arab squatters, who have been squatting there a long time now, can just go find a new home. There's a line from a Roger Waters' song that seems appropriate here; 'What God wants, God gets; God help us all'.
Things are already ugly and ethically complicated, but it gets even worse. This brings us to what has to be the biggest group supporting the Zionist dream, and that would be Zionist Christians. Those familiar with the eschatology of conservative Christianity will know what lies at the heart of all this. For those who don't, let me explain.
First of all, eschatology is the branch of theology concerned with the end of the world. Conservative Christians have some interesting ideas about this, based on their reading of Revelation. Well, actually, they are quite childish ideas. They, the born again believers, will be whisked off to heaven (the rapture) while the rest of us nonbelievers scratch our heads trying to figure out where our very religious neigbours and family members wandered off to. Then a series of very nasty things will happen to us (the tribulation) while they are forced to gleefully watch. They've warned us about this countless times; it could happen any day now.
Now, I don't keep up with all the details, and perhaps some of them have changed recently. Hal Lindsay's books no longer make much sense, so perhaps they've been busy reinterpreting Revelation in the light of the present political landscape, as is their custom. Regardless, Zionist Christians supported, and continue to support the state of Isreal for one reason; to usher on the end of the world. And they're growing restless.
Saturday, October 08, 2005
Mohammed on Christianity
'Wherefore he did not himself suffer death, but Simon, a certain man of Cyrene, being compelled, bore the cross in his stead; so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them.'
This is Irenaeus quoting a bit of Basilides, an early Gnostic. You find something very similar in the Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter. In other gnostic texts the solution is similar, but not quite so extreme. For the most part, Gnostic's rejected Christ's humanity, because of their views on matter, and this meant different approaches towards what the crucifixion was or meant.
Within Islam is the notion that the books of the New Testament have been edited over time, and as such, the original meanings of the books have been lost, or at least have a spurious nature. I'm sure this view would not have been hard to come by among Gnostic circles as well. Or even some other heterodox form of Christianity.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
The Politics of Christianity: Elaine Pagels
Christians invoking terms such as "evil-doers" read the bible, as anyone does, selectively. They choose the parts they like and they leave out the parts they don't. In this case the parts they like are the parts about an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, that is—and a life for a life. If someone's taken a life, then their life is required. And that's certainly a biblical tenet. Of course, it's from the Old Testament. You don't hear much about forgiveness and turning the other cheek from our President and his administration. The Old Testament is what they choose for this occasion because it suits their purpose.
What I've learned through studying the Gospel of Thomas and the context of the politics of early Christianity, is that anyone who participates in Christian tradition without having learned anything about it—and that's most people who participate in it, because it's not taught in public or private schools for the most part—often think of their traditions as immutable, as if they've just come down from God."
Read the whole article here. Elaine Pagels well known for her books on early Christianity and Gnosticism; it is quite interesting to read her contrast of this to modern American politics.
Sunday, October 02, 2005
Theologian Quiz
>created with
QuizFarm.com


